Archive for the ‘Commentary’ Category

Part Four: Good News :) I am so very happy :) :) :) :)

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Time to Celebrate! (Case Dismissed) Maplewood has dismissed the case against me for my “failure to comply” with the arresting officers unconstitutional demands!!!! This is great news as I leave for the Continental Congress of 2009 TOMORROW and return the day before I was supposed to go to court – It would have been hard to focus on solutions to the many issues we face with the potential of 30 days jail or $1000 fine looming over my head, especially since I committed no crime!

Read part one of the story here: http://www.libertyrestorationproject.org/2009/10/15/part-1-the-arrest-or-kidnapping-in-violation-of-my-first-amendment-protections/
Read part two of the story here: http://www.libertyrestorationproject.org/2009/10/16/part-two-the-unlawful-detention/

Further Action (Taking them on): This will NOT stop here. Today I requested any discipline against my arresting officer, including but not limited to disciplinary action surrounding MY arrest. He is a rookie who only became an officer in May of this year, but I still need to know if this was an isolated incident or not. I picked up the full surveillance tape today, too.

Growing Together (Constitution Course): The Maplewood Constitution Course is this weekend (please rsvp so we know how much pizza to buy). It will be taught by Scott Wood who teaches the advanced Constitution Courses for the Riverbend 912 group. It will have an emphasis on individuals rights in relation to law enforcement, driving and an overall idea of the Constitutional role of government. Saturday November 14th from noon to 4pm. Please RSVP here: http://maplewoodconstitutioncourse.eventbrite.com

Fighting Globalism with Localism (What is CC2009 anyway?): The main reason I am so grateful these charges were dropped TODAY is so I may focus more strongly on the Continental Congress of 2009 – and it is nearly 24 hours out! This historic event is taking place in the suburbs of Chicago and will bring three citizen delegates from each state together for 11 days to discuss strategy we can implement to shift the growing trend toward tyranny in America. I have been elected as a delegate and feel very blessed to be the citizen spokes person for the state of Missouri. I have formed a state/local caucus of delegates and am working, with Josh helping every step of the way, along side with activists from all across the country to come up with a state/local initiative plan that can help guide us on our path to freedom.

How to Support Us (Rocking CC2009): If you are interested in supporting our trip to the CC2009, we are raising money to cover costs (approx $750). We have already received a total of $375 in donations from 6 amazing folks. I cannot tell you how blessed we feel to have your support, please accept a big, genuine “Thank You”. If you can help at all, even $5, we are raising funds at http://kctodc.chipin.com/continental-congress. You know me, I don’t like to ask for money, but this is something in which I feel we MUST have a strong presence. I have been diligently volunteering for LRP in a fulltime capacity for almost 2 years now and rarely ask for a thing in return, this time I’m asking for your support in prayers, finances and even advice :)

The ongoing battle (back to Maplewood): If you are interested in supporting my ongoing fight against unconstitutional arrest (kidnapping) and detainment I was forced to endure on October 12 in Maplewood, here are the things that would be the greatest help:

1. Help spread the word about the Maplewood Constitution Course (we have fliered the community for three Sundays) – know a local radio host – have an interested email list? http://maplewoodconstitutioncourse.eventbrite.com

2. Educate yourself on your rights and the Constitutional role of law enforcement - if we expect those making the laws to abide by their oath, we sure as heck better make sure those with guns who enforce the laws are, too! You can attend this free course my RSVPing here: http://maplewoodconstitutioncourse.eventbrite.com

3. Consider supporting the Liberty Restoration Project financially - You can set up a monthly donation as low as $5 by visiting: http://www.libertyrestorationproject.org/donate.php The funds you donate to LRP go straight to streets of Missouri or the halls of Jefferson City. Your donation money goes a very long with with LRP, we try to spend money only in ways that provides a direct interaction with the community – gas money to testify in committee hearings in Jefferson City, paying for documents obtained through the Missouri Sunshine Law, printing fliers to put on doors or pass out in the community (we have handed out 10s of thousands of fliers in the Kansas City and Saint Louis metro areas in the past year), etc.. We have found great success in our style of direct, assertive, yet loving activism, and we could not be where we are today with out each and every one of you :) And yes, we are all 100% VOLUNTEERS!!!

4. Spread the word about my arrest: People need to hear the truth about what is happening in many of our law enforcement communities today, the greater we can grow the buzz around the incident, the greater the likelihood I will be successful in an offensive strategy against them. One of my goals is to ensure every employee of the city of Maplewood understands the Constitution before I’m done. Same goes for the citizens. I am not out to smear our law enforcement community, just hold them accountable to the Constitution in the same fashion many of us are working to hold our elected officials accountable to the Constitution. I hope you will support that :)

I love you all, and will be live tweeting from cc2009 for the next 11 days at www.twitter.com/donttreadoncat ( I will be back in StL for the Constitution Course).
You can also follow my video blogs and personal blog updates at www.donttreadoncat.com . I will be updating as relevant to LRP at www.libertyrestorationproject.org

peace, love and LIBERTY,
Catherine

Catherine Bleish
executive director
Liberty Restoration Project

http://www.LibertyRestorationProject.org/

blog: http://www.donttreadoncat.com/
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/DontTreadOnMe

Freedom reaches across party lines.

Part Three: Shaping the Community in Response the Unlawful Arrest and Detention (Maplewood Constitution Course)

Monday, November 9th, 2009

After going through an unlawful arrest and detention, it is easy to feel defeated by the system. (read part 1 here and part 2 here)

While I am frustrated that the prosecuting attorney has yet to sign off on my charges (so I’m technically STILL not charged, although I spent 5 hours in jail and had to post $750 bond), I am feeling very optimistic about finding a resolution – let me tell you why.

While in jail I learned that many of the women incarcerated do not understand their rights. They do not understand the Constitution or how our country was formed, nor do they understand the proper role of government or law enforcement. They have accepted police abuse and targeting as a fact of life. One girl, after arriving, said, “well I better kick back and enjoy a few free meals, I’m sure I’ll be here a few days”. Why were these women in jail? Most were unable to afford the property tax on their vehicles and were swooped up off the streets and incarcerated, the remainder were for other issues surrounding the use of a vehicle. None of them had hurt anyone or damaged/stolen any property. Doesn’t sound very free to me.

In response to the situation found in Maplewood, the Liberty Restoration Project is excited to announce that we are sponsoring a FREE four hour Constitution Course for the citizens of Maplewood. This course will be taught by Scott Wood who teaches Advanced Constitution courses for the Riverbend 912 group and will take place at the Maplewood Library on November 14th from noon to 4pm. You can RSVP here: http://maplewoodconstitutioncourse.eventbrite.com.

For the past 3 weeks we have gone door to door in the community of Maplewood handing out fliers for the course. We also have fliers up in 9 area businesses. The response from the community was overwhelmingly supportive. Not one person disagreed with our course of action, all stating that Maplewood Police have a reputation that is NOT favorable, although most folks we spoke to made sure to clarify they DO support fair law enforcement (so does LRP).

What action will I be taking personally?
1. I have received 4 minutes of the surveillance footage, and am picking up the rest today or tomorrow. I have also requested and received the Oath of Office of the arrest officer (he was a rookie, sworn in May 26, 2009).
2. I have filed a complaint against the city of Maplewood and the arresting officer – I have already met with Internal Affairs over this matter. My entire conversation is recorded, I will try to post soon.
3. I have filed a complaint against the city of Richmond Heights and the officer who treated me so poorly in jail, they have not responded yet.
4. I am working closely with Fox Channel 2’s investigative reporter – big things coming :) Stay Tuned.
5. I have found a first amendment attorney who is going to represent me pro-bono. Both offensive and defensive. Gear up.

If you want to help in anyway, feel free to get in touch :)

Catherine Bleish
executive director
Liberty Restoration Project
816.868.8806
Catherine@libertyrestorationproject.org

Part Two: The Unlawful Detention

Friday, October 16th, 2009
*And just to clarify – my beef is not with the law enforcement community as a whole, just those violoating their oath to protect the freedoms that our country was founded upon.*
The arresting officer immediately handed me off to a second officer who walked me down to an awaiting police car.  The entire time I asked what I was being arrested for and stated that they were violating my Constitutionally protected freedom of speech. The officer on the right told me he “did not remember” if he took an oath to the Constitution.  I was initially put in the second of two holding cells while Toni, the girl who was transported with me was put in the first cell.  
 
Lori, the blond cop, would demand I do something and while I was doing it demand I do another.  She came at me aggressively several times, but I never cowered at her attempts to intimidate me.  I told her I could only do one thing at a time and if she’d let me finish getting my shoe laces out we could discuss the nose ring (she wanted to forcibly remove it) At one point, after she had come up and started ripping the string out of my hoodie, I stopped her, what business did she have ruining my hoodie?!??!  There is just no way I would have ever got that string back in!  She let me remove the shirt instead of ruining it.  She told me to get out of her face.  I had not moved, she had walked up to me and aggressively got in my space then demanded I get out of her face.  I told her that, and she backed away. 
 
I was told if I did not remove my semi-permanent nose ring that I would be pinned down and medical would “cut it out”.  The older gentleman who was processing my paperwork during this time is the one who told me that.  It was repeated by Lori. This was the only point where I was not able to maintain my emotional composure.  I got very scared.  They had pointed a taser at Kimberly and I was imagining them holding me down, tasing me or cutting my face open or permanently disfiguring me in some way.  What the heck does “cut it out” mean?  They were seriously going to pin me down and cut something out of my face when I had committed NO CRIME?  I started to cry and begged for them to not make me take it out.  It hurts, you see the permanent ball on the inside of my nose is bigger than the stud, this is so my nose will basically heal around it and it won’t ever fall out.  When it comes out, it scraps the flesh from the piercing canal, bleeds, and hurts for days. 
 
I agreed to take it out but had to beg to do it with soap and water at a sink.  I knew it would bleed (and it did, not a lot, but it spotted) and I knew in that filthy jail that I was likely to get it infected and be in a lot of pain if I did not have a sink and soap. I had to BEG for this. 
 
At this point Lori, the blond officer, began making fun of me.  Calling me a whinny baby and a moron for having a nose ring.  I was later told by Sergeant Votaw that calling their detainees names is not standard protocol.
 
Why did I have to BEG for access to sanitation when being forced against my will to do something I am telling them will make me bleed?  Why was I forced to do something that not only terrified me, but hurt me badly?  If we are considered innocent until proven guilty, why did I feel like I was being punished?  Putting the nose ring back in was much worse than taking it out as the inside of the piercing canal was swollen and raw.  I still had not been told what I was being charged with or why I was being put in a cage. 
 
I spoke to every officer, individual, and detainee that walked by.  I figured if I made this an experience they would never forget, that they might go home, get online and research some of the things I am talking about.  They had made an attempt to silence me through force, restraints and a cage, but I knew I had committed no crime and that in their hearts they knew that too.  At the least, they’d go home and talk to their spouse about the things I was saying. 
 
After the nose ring incident I was put in the same holding cell as Toni, the girl who had rode over with me.  She sat me down and said, “I didn’t know that white people felt this way”.  We talked about how the police treat people in her community.  I explained to her that Obama and Bush are one in the same, that our country has not been free or representative for a long time.  We began talking about a plan to help her community learn their rights.
 
As I continued to talk about the Constitution and oathkeepers.org to the officers, they decided it’d be best to go ahead and move me to the back before processing me.  So they did. Every time an officer came back I continued speaking of the Constitution and how NOT free I was at that moment.  One officer realized I was never given a blanket and came back with one for me.  I talked with my cell mate and the girls in the cell down the hall about how the people are treated in their community.  I heard stories that broke my heart.  The girls are routinely pulled over and their plates have already been run.  They said if you are black and you get pulled over in Maplewood you are either going to be beat up or arrested.  They told me that officers ask them questions like “how do you afford this car” when they walk up to their window.  These are girls with children, some of whom did not know who their child was with as they could not get ahold of anyone because everyone they know has cell phones.  Is this really for the public good?
 
I knew the word about my arrest had got out because someone I know from Southern IL had called the jail and the officers told me to call him (of course I did not have his number as I was in JAIL and of course they did not write down for me).  It felt good to know people were concerned.
 
I called my mom collect about 10 times before getting through, they had been out for my dad’s birthday (Happy birthday, huh?  Daughter’s in jail).  I initially told her that I did not know what I was being charged with and to help me find out and to find out what my bail is. Toni was in that cell again at that point, and my mom took her boyfriend’s number and called him to let him know where she was and what her bail was.  She too doesn’t know people with landlines.  When I called my mom back she reported that Maplewood had told my mother that they were likely not charging me with anything and just holding me for 24 hours.
 
I was devastated.  They KNEW they were not going to charge me with something but were going to hold me behind bars for a day anyway?  What had I done to deserve this?!  At that time I gave my mother my twitter user name and password and had her log into start reporting what was happening.  She did.  From the response that I’ve received, Maplewood was bombarded with hundreds of phone calls throughout the night and next day.
 
Allison Gibbs of the Ladies of Liberty Alliance had tried to bail me out – Josh was trying to bail me out at the Maplewood Courthouse.  They told people who called there would be no bail and that I was being held for 24 hours and that there was no going around it.   
 
I was finally processed, after everyone else, even detainees who came in after me.  This felt like deliberate retaliation to me. 
 
At this point the cells were becoming extremely cold.  There was toilet paper shoved in the vent blowing down on my top bunk bed in an apparent attempt by a previous detainee to stop the cold air from blowing so hard.  The girls in my cell began to cry out “we’re cold”.  We all began asking for blankets.  After what seemed like 15 minutes of this, Lori came back and told us she was “too busy” to get us blankets or turn off the AC (it was coat weather outside!). 
 
I called my mother a third time and let her know about the freezing temperatures and the refusal to help us.  No one in there with me had been convicted of anything, just swooped up off the streets due to a warrant.  These people should still be presumed innocent and there was NO reason for us to be kept in such horrible conditions.  It really was miserable being that cold.  My mother told me that she was getting emails from people saying I had been left go.  I did not know it, but Josh had bailed me out 1.5 hours before I was let out.    I still did not know what my charges were!
 
I started screaming at the top of my lungs that people were saying I was FREE yet they still had me in a CAGE – I sang songs at the top of my lungs about how they were lying to my friends and family saying I was free when I was not. 
 
Lori finally came around the corner, sighed and leaned against the wall.  She asked “what?”.  I said, politely, “why am I still in a cage when my friends and family are telling me I’m free?”.  She told me that Josh had bailed me out and opened the cage.  She made fun of me saying, “you’re not a bonafied activist, this is the first time you’ve been arrested”.  This surprised me, I guess it is to be expected if you are a law abiding protester that you will be arrested these days….  sad.  She also said to me, “you’re not that important”.  My response was a smile and, “Ask Maplewood how many phone calls they received”. 
 
While giving me my belongings another officer tried making fun of me.  Saying what would I do if he came up and urinated on my desk, or took s dump.  He claimed that was his free speech and said I would likely use the cops against him for that.  I tried to respond a few times but was so happy to get out that I just decided to smile when he interrupted me to make fun of me more.  When Lori let me out the door she said, condescendingly, “go be free little butterfly”. 
 
It wasn’t until I walked around to the front and found Josh and Jesse standing there that I found out I was charged with “Failure to Comply” and that my bail had been the insanely high amount of $750.
 
How dare they, especially after telling my family I wasn’t going to be charged.
 
Article I Section 1- “That all constitutional government is intended to promote the general welfare of the people; that all persons have a natural right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and the enjoyment of the gains of their own industry; that all persons are created equal and are entitled to equal rights and opportunity under the law; that to give security to these things is the principal office of government, and that when government does not confer this security, it fails in its chief design.“ 
 
– The Richmond Heights Police Department claimed they did not know the charges against me. To imprison someone, threaten them with physical harm both to person and property without having substantiated any charges against that person is destructively and criminally negligent.
 
Article 1 Section 10- “That no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.”
 
– The Richmond Heights Police Department detained me without knowing if I had even been charged with a crime. All jails have a responsibility to make sure that all detentions are lawful, and if Richmond Heights wants to sell its jail space to other municipalities, it must take steps to ensure that these other municipalities’ officers are making lawful arrests and that they are not forcibly detaining a kidnapping victim.  .
 
Article 1 Section 21 “That excessive bail shall not be required nor excessive fines imposed nor cruel and unusual punishment be inflicted.
– While in custody at the Richmond Heights facility I was forced against my will after having been unlawfully arrested (kidnapped) and detained to cause physical pain to myself under the threat of having greater pain inflicted.  I was also forced to endure (as were the other girls) unreasonable temperatures.  I have later learned that this is a tactic used to keep detainees “docile”.  I had committed no crime, I had no reason to be there, and had absolutely NO reason to be treated in such inhumane manors.  I am not an animal. 
 
Catherine Bleish
executive director
Liberty Restoration Project
http://www.LibertyRestorationProject.org/

Midwest Liberty Fest: Showcase of the skills, talent and creativity found within the grassroots: Documentary premiers, Freedom concerts, Workshops, Speakers, and FUN.  http://www.midwestlibertyfest.com/

blog: http://www.donttreadonact.com/
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/DontTreadOnMe

Freedom reaches across party lines.

Part 1: The “Arrest” (or kidnapping) in violation of my First Amendment Protections

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Part 1: The “Arrest” (or kidnapping)

The story of my arrest is ironic at best. After exhausting myself with my volunteer work the past few months I decided to take a few days away from the cell and email. So when Josh and I left for Maplewood for his court date, I left my camera and cellphone at home. How many times have I said you should ALWAYS be armed with a camera? Yeah, listen to me eat those words through this story.

We arrived at the Maplewood courthouse and there was a line out the door. Maybe 45 people standing in the late dusk dark. Josh got out of the car and I parked it. When I arrived. It was cold, I regretted only wearing a hooded sweatshirt and the infant in line in front of us had tears on her cheeks because of the wind. It was misting on and off that entire day. Every one’s court time said 6:30, yet we were standing outside despite the ticking clock and colder/darker surroundings.

In line folks joked about leaving a note on the door that said “we arrived to our appointment at the schedule time, where were you?”. Or “Its 7:15 sorry we missed you”. Everyone in line that we spoke to were there over a traffic violation – lots of unregistered plates (all citing they could not afford property tax on the car, yes, that’s right, the state of Missouri taxes us hundreds of dollars per year to own a car, AFTER we’ve paid sales tax on it. Sucks), lots of failure to pay for car insurance (maybe if they didn’t have to pay property tax they could afford insurance!), almost everyone had been pulled over to or from work.

They let about 15 people into the courthouse and the group moved forward. We all stepped up onto the patio area where it was lit so we didn’t have to stand on the dark sidewalk (there was room now that the others went in). A police officer came out and started demanding the folks line up against the wall. I was talking to a girl a few years my junior about the situation, who I later learned is named Kimberly. I said “Line up, show us your papers, give us your money; Welcome to the New America”. The officer heard me say that and asked me to repeat it. I repeated the comment and he walked toward me asking “does any body have a leash for her, if so put it on her”. Kimberly, the girl I was talking to, shouted, “Did you seriously just say that? Are you implying she’s a bitch?”. The officer then walked up to us and said, “do you want to go to jail tonight”? I asked “for what”, he said, “I will make something up”. I turned and asked the crowd if they had just heard that. They responded in chorus, yes! and he then repeated “I will make something up!” – Kimberly was saying something while this was going on (it was inaudible to me), he turned to her and said, “I know who you’re here with I have something for you” and pointed right at Kimberly – she said, “What are you threatening me?!?” – he walked back inside.

When he came back out he walked up to me and said I had two minutes to leave or he would arrest me. I said on what charges, you said you would make something up! I told him he had no right to make me leave as I had done nothing wrong and that he was supposed to be upholding his oath the to Constitution and protecting my first amendment instead of trying to take it from me.

When he walked inside I grabbed a pen and piece of paper and wrote down that I had just been told I would be arrested on made up charges and handed it to Josh and asked him to have the crowd sign it if he came back out. I asked everyone if they would support me if I stayed and the crowd said yes. A few said it was not worth it, but I told them I had to stand my ground and exercise my constitutional right to SPEAK!

Three officers, in violation of my first amendment protection of speech, ran out onto the patio, surrounded me, lifted me by my right arm as it was twisted behind me and slammed me into the railing. Kimberly started shouting things like she’s “just a girl” and “you dont’ have to hurt her like that”. While the officer cuffed me, another pointed a taser gun at Kimberly’s chest (I later found out Kimberly has had a heart attack previously). Kimberly told he cop, “you will NOT use lethal force against me”. She left the grounds of the courthouse in fear that she would be further attacked.

At this point I was escorted to a cop car – the entire time I asked repeatedly why I was being arrested and if he had taken an oath to the Constitution and if he understood that he was violating my first amendment.

I was put in the car where I spent the entire time with my face in the ear of the cops talking about the Constitution and OathKeepers.org – the officer in the passenger seat told me he “did not remember if he took an oath to the Constitution”.

They put me in a holding cell by myself at first. I did not stop talking about the Constitution and how they could not take my right to speak freely away, I chose to assert that right despite the cuffs and bars.

I was wrongfully arrested for saying something the officer did not like, that was bad enough, I will summarize my experience in jail in part 2 and you will see with absolute certainty that our “justice” system has become a mechanism for the state to extract money from the peoples by force. And they literally do think of us as animals (evident by the leash comment).

Here are all the sections of the Missouri Constitution that were violated during my arrest and bailing proceedures. Many more were broken during my time in their cage.

Article 1 Section 2: That all Constitutional government is intended to promote the general welfare of the people, that all persons have a natural right to life, liberty and the pursuit to happiness and the enjoyment of the gains of their own industry… To security to these things is the principle office of government and that when the government does not confer the security, it fails in its chief design.

Article 1 Section 8: …..Every person shall be free to say write or publish or otherwise communicate whatever he will on any subject…
- I was told to leave the property of the Maplewood Courthouse in violation of my god given, constitutionally protected, 1st amendment right to practice free speech. I was subsequently put in a cage like an animal for refusing to obey an unlawful and unconstitutional order.

Article 1 Section 9: People have the right to peaceably assemble for the common good and to apply to those invested with the powers of government for redress of grievances by petition or remonstrance.
-The comment I made was reflective of the sentiments of the entire crowd forced to stand outside in the cold, dark wind. We did not chose to assemble there, but we were peaceful and expressing our grievances vocally.

Article 1 Section 10: That no person be deprived of life, liberty or pursuit of happiness without due process of law.
-Maplewood police attempted to deprive me of my liberty (free speech) by violating their oath to the Constitution and arresting me for refusing to obey an unlawful order after that same officer said he would “make up charges” to arrest me, they also deprived me of my liberty by putting me behind bars and preventing me from pursuing happiness by putting me in a cage. I was never told what I was arrested for. My mother was told I would not be charged at all, yet held for 24 hours. The Maplewood police at one point apparently had the intention of holding an innocent person behind bars without pressing charges for an entire day.

Article 1 Section 20: That all persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties except for capitol offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption great.
Section 21: That excessive bail should not be required nor excessive fines imposed nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.
- I was voluntarly in line at court to accompany someone else, there was no reason to beleive I would not show up to my court date. A bail of $750 when you were not only entertaining the idea of not event charging me at all, but telling my family and friends that there would be no charges, seems quite excessive. Also considering the bail set for my boyfriend who had three charges was only $500.

Our Founding Principle

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Written by Travis Maddox.

For us to see a resurgence of Liberty and Freedom in America today I believe we must find our way back to our roots, not roots in a particular political party or the roots of conservatism or libertarianism but back to the roots of Liberty. Our Founders did this when they took on the endeavor to establish a more perfect Union. We must understand what Liberty is and where it comes from.

Our Founders believed that we are endowed by our Creator certain unalienable rights, that man was a free being. Free to work, think and choose for himself or herself. They believed man only answered to God. The belief was that these unalienable rights were “untouchable” or “incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred” as Black’s Law Dictionary puts it. In other words man nor government could take them away. Our Founders were well educated and well read and understood Liberty and where it came from.

Today conservative/constitutional/libertarians understand Liberty but only as it pertains to their agenda. We are divided and only focus on our “pet projects”. Life, guns, sovereignty, drugs, the FED and many others are very important issues to fight for but if we do not know where the foundation of those and other issues are rooted in we might continue to fail.

Our founders knew this and that is why many of them looked upon the issues they faced through the eyes of individual liberty. Man is free regardless of his physical state, his mind, body and spirit were created free and only answerable to his creator and himself. Many Founders knew that the only way for man to prosper, create and develop true growth as a being was to be completely free. So one might ask if this is true then why create a government at all? Our Founders feared that complete anarchy would turn to tyranny. It is easy for man to become corrupt when there is no protection for our rights, the strongest or the one with the most guns, rules.

So their task was simple yet difficult. Create a system where man is free to worship, live, create, build and prosper but with only enough government to protect those rights. You see our Founders knew that the only true responsibility of a government was to protect a person’s individual rights. Everything they did was weighed against that principle. Were they always right? No. We are imperfect and imperfect being’s create imperfect things. That is the reason though behind the Constitution being the supreme law of the land. They knew with the Constitution there would always be a foundation to fall back on.

So where have we gone wrong today in our fight for freedom? Today we focus on our pet projects and some of us have several. We fight these issues most of the time autonomous of other organizations or parties and most always with good intentions. Our flaw in all of this is many of us have forgotten our founding principles; that man is free and governments only responsibility is to protect that freedom, all other actions a government may do treads on that freedom.

I hear all the time that we need to go back to the Regan or Goldwater days or go back to the roots of conservatism or even back to the Founders. While all that talk may be good it is still in vain because it does not go deep to our founding principle. It will only take us back to a flawed man. What is that founding principle? LIBERTY!

Now I know by now I have stepped on a few toes but maybe that is a good thing. You can still fight for the issues that are important to you just remember where the principles of that battle are founded. Man is free and governments only job is to protect that freedom. Now with that point of view things become clear as we debate certain issues. Do we have a right to live? A right to protect our lives? Yes. Then governments only job is to protect that right. How about to own property and be secure in it? What would the government’s job be? And to defend our lives and property? You see when we view these and other issues through our founding principles the answers to what government’s role is, is easy. Our Founders even acknowledged that government’s job is to protect the right of the individual to overthrow and change the said government when it becomes too far reaching.

Now ask yourself how many things does our government do that does not protect mans right to be free? If whatever action a government is doing does not protect the Liberty of man to be free then we must fight against those actions and maybe against the government committing those actions, it is our duty.

Today our government has become the antithesis of our founding principle. Everything they do these days works against individual Liberty. I fear we are closing in on the day when we must decide to take up our duty and throw off such a government. Until that day comes and while you continue fighting the issues that make you a passionate patriot remember the foundation fighting those battles is mans Liberty and right to be free. Do this and it will strengthen you for the larger battle that may still lie ahead.

MIAC Hearing: Worse than we thought? Guilt by Association Until Proven Innocent & The DC Museum Shooter.

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

Commentary from my blog over at nerfmild.blogspot.com

http://nerfmild.blogspot.com/2009/06/miac-hearing-worse-than-we-thought.html

MIAC Hearing: Worse than we thought? Guilt by Association Until Proven Innocent & The DC Museum Shooter.

Government, Media, and Police Perceptions of State Intelligence Fusion
by Kevin L. Kobe

The following was written over the course of June 10-13, 2009

JUNE 10, 2009 | Jefferson City, Missouri

The Missouri House of Representatives special committee on state intelligence held its first hearing on the Missouri Information Analysis Center. After the recent actions discussing de-funding MIAC, The change of leadership at MIAC, and the politicians denouncing the Militia Report, we were to believe that the issues were understood and being addressed.

However, This committee hearing has opened my eyes that the Missouri Highway Patrol and members of the state house have no idea why their operations are dangerous and tyrannical. This three hour hearing went forward, beginning with some structural rules, followed by a slide show powerpoint on the operations of the MIAC. This slide show outlined how and when the MIAC was created, the agencies that utilize their services, and some of the cases where MIAC has provided successful information in solving crimes. One thing missing from this powerpoint was the hot button issue of Strategic Reports. The powerpoint was filled with examples of “Cattle Theft Intelligence” and the presentation even included a case where a website moderator contacted law enforcement, who then contacted MIAC, who then contacted Lee’s Summit Police, who then contacted a school to verify a comment on a website where a child expressed concern about the possibility of his school being attacked. The concern turned out not to be an active plot.

One of the first comments that stood out in the minds of the patriots listening, was from Representative Viebrock. He mentioned “A revolutionary war mentality I’m hearing around the state that needs to be watched.” Shortly after, the questions turned to the Strategic Reports, and it seemed that the longer the discussion went on, the less ashamed the officers defending their organization appeared to be in relation to profiling citizens.

First Col. James Keathley was asked if MIAC still issues Strategic Reports. MIAC apparently is not currently issuing these, and they aren’t looking to in the near future, with the current feelings about such reports.

Then the line of questioning turned to future reports. The possibility of future Strategic Reports is not ruled out, but again, are not currently being planned or worked on.

Continued testimony mentioned several times extreme cases of citizen violence on police or the public. Including the shooting of Dr. George Tiller 2 weeks ago, and the shootings at the National Holocaust Museum this very morning. The citing of these extremes as an excuse to “detect and analyze trends” would have been disturbing enough, but the case they really pushed was the shooting of a Missouri Law Enforcement Officer years ago by “A guy that possibly could have been identified by the rhetoric on his bumper stickers.” Questioning from the committee revealed a response that information should always have a criminal predicate.

The first of the public testimony was from LRP’s own Catherine. She mentioned various flaws from federal funding, the use of federal agencies through state operations, the direct mention of the Federal Reserve and other “Government Criminals” and who is profiling and studying this criminal activity. She then asked the committee if the “Revolutionary mentality” frightened them more, or that the actions of government has placed people in the position where they feel they need to take that approach frightened them more. She asked about reports that much of the information in the Milita Report came from the Southern Poverty Law Center, a political based influential study group. She also brought up an interesting point on the timing of the creation. It was mentioned earlier that the Militia Report was started in June 2008, upon request (didn’t mention who requested it), and compiled by an employee who they were keeping anonymous, an “Iraq Vet.” Catherine pointed out that May 31, 2008 was the state convention in which Ron Paul’s state campaign was at odds with the established members of the Missouri Republican Party. Within a month, this document which directly names Ron Paul and Campaign For Liberty begins being drafted by the State, upon request?

The next citizen testimony came from a passionate man who was concerned with state family services and warned of the dangers of targeting those passionate against government intervention in the lives of individuals.

The next public testimony came from the Cole County Sheriff Greg White, Who described himself as an Iraq Veteran, pro-life and pro-second amendment. He advocated for the strategic reports to be reinstated as an active policy, mentioning the need for examining behaviors, and likened the practice to “School personnel studying bad behaviors to find out which students are problem children.”

The final testimony came from myself. I mentioned how nervous the buzzwords of the day had made me. I mentioned the dangers of profiling, The absurdity of comparing a free populous to school children to be studies and dealt with, and how talking about how bumper stickers can change the fight or flight response of a police officer during a public interaction is not always a good thing.

The following day, June 11, KY3 the NBC affiliate in Springfield, MO covered this hearing. They also have a “Political Notebook” blog in which they took segments of Catherine Bleish and Sheriff Greg White’s testimony and “pitted” them against each other in all of their coverage. They also had a video of Governor Nixon requesting that the House members not read too much into the MIAC operations.

In this coverage, only the other police testimony is described, not the other citizens who testified against profiling. The testimony shown is shortened, and David Cantanese’s twitter posts from the MIAC hearing, one which says “Ron Paul supporter on a diatribe” have conversations traced to a few individuals who are insulting the idea that we wouldn’t agree with what police feel they need, one even repeating the guilt by association idea that the Holocaust Museum shooting showed the need to profile “All Fringe Groups”

The reason I bring this last point up, is not to associate KY3 or David Cantanese with those who follow and comment on his Twitter, but to show how guilt by association seems to be the name of the game now.

The night of June 12th, I managed to catch a report on CNN of “Lone Wolf Extremism” where Anderson Cooper and several “experts” were discussing racist extremist behavior. Statistics and reports from the Southern Poverty Law Center were being cited every few minutes. Every expert during the 20 minutes that I was watching came from either a racial diversity group or from a diversity department of a University. They even had a “former skinhead” who now worked under a diversity group. It was even mentioned that the current dislike for President Obama is fueling racist groups.

Since then, Glenn Beck has associated the Holocaust Museum Shooter with 9/11 protesters, without citing any source.

Keith Olbermann felt the need to mention that someone who worked on the Ron Paul Campaign lives in the same house as the person that the Holocaust Museum Shooter gave a website to.

And a CBS News blogger has written a report calling for “People who spread hate” to be “Rounded up” before “More Holocaust Museum Shootings” happen.

I am not going to be afraid of perceptions. Some will read this and say that I’m reading more into these things or tying random things together or taking things too personally. Let the facts be known in a manner that shows why I feel targeted by media, government, and the attempt to create public perception of hate:

  1. Several media attempts are now being made to tie in grassroots political activists with racist extremism, without citing credible sources.

  2. The MIAC Militia report mixes racist & extremist behaviors with things supported by grassroots political activism

  3. Several attempts are being made to associate dislike for the President’s policies with hatred and racism.

  4. The MIAC report, even though the Highway Patrol says that there has to be a “Criminal Predicate” they still specifically listed by name the “End The Fed” rally that was organized by Liberty Restoration Project. If our speech is not being accused of being criminal then why weren’t we contacted with information that criminals attended or planned to attend our rally? If we are being accused of being criminals, where is the evidence or the case against us? Or is Freedom and the restoration of Constitutional Principles now considered criminal? Also mentioned were supporters of presidential candidates, and we are not hearing any reports of criminal activity around Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, or Bob Barr. I also would like to know what the film “America: From Freedom to Fascism” has to do with crime.

  5. Not a single person associated with MIAC has been able to answer the “Trends” and validity question with recent examples of extremism tied to the profile in the Militia Report. Every case so far, cited in the report and from members and supporters of MIAC happened years before the Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin campaigns. Years before the release of “America: From Freedom to Fascism” and years before the “End the Fed” rallies. The Holocaust Museum and Dr. Tiller shootings happened after the release of the militia report. Why was there a need for this report in June 2008 when the Militia Report began or February 2009 when it was released?

  6. If we create these organizations to examine and report on criminal trends, I would like to know which other “Trends” that have been reported on. In the Kansas City area our local government has installed several red light cameras because we had a problem with people running red lights. Where is the Red Light Running trend report? A few years back there was several news stories of women attacking pregnant women and cutting babies out of them. Has there been a report on these practices? How about a report on Teachers having sex with students, or religious leaders sexually assaulting children? These are all things we hear about as “Criminal Trends” in our society, are these groups being profiled? How about Governors? With what happened to Former Governor Elliot Spitzer of New York and Former Governor Rod Blagojevich of Illinois, and the recent accusations that Governor Jay Nixon’s office was attempting to influence legislators’ votes with career advancement opportunities show that Governors can be included in a “Criminal Trend Report”

  7. Why is Governor Jay Nixon flip-flopping on this issue? First he supported the document fully, then he had nothing to do with it and blamed his predecessor, and dealt out punishment, and now he is coming out again asking us not to throw the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to our Highway Patrol profiling us?

  8. Catherine asked in the hearing about Centralization in reference to Knowledge as Power. When the State and Local governments are collaborating with the Federal Government in a program that collects Intel on our state’s citizens, is it a general good idea to give power on that level upwards in the chain? Is the Department of Homeland Security using the information gathered by local governments? If so, are they using it to database and compile profiles on whole segments of local populations, or profiles on innocent individuals?

  9. The media and government commentary on “Hate crime” and “Hate speech” never define the terminology of these phrases. When they do discuss “Hate” they never make a calculated examination of what should be protected under the First Amendment and what should be watched and controlled. They appear to cast a wide net that seems to include all controversial speech that they do not agree with.

Cointelpro was a program spying on Civil Rights activists. It was profiling and intelligence. I did not agree when our government targeted these Civil Rights activists. While I agree with closing the borders, I did not agree with our government targeting Latinos that are already here. After 9/11 I did not agree with the wish of some to profile middle easterners and members of the Muslim religion.

One of the key backbones to our society is Innocence until proven guilty. Justice must remain blind. If you didn’t agree when the media said that “anti-war supports terrorists” then please don’t buy into the current feeling being portrayed that “conservative ideals and activism supports racists and extremism.”

If you live in Missouri, it is your duty to keep an eye out for the Missouri House of Representatives Website for the upcoming roaming committee town hall hearings on the MIAC center and try to make it to one near your area and defend free speech and the freedom to associate without being guilty by association.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/12/usnews/whispers/main5083962.shtml

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnists.nsf/tonymessenger/story/70B986F245B647E0862575D300049068?OpenDocument

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/10/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5078760.shtml

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/11/navarrette.hate.crimes/

The Boy who cried “Politics”

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

I’m noticing more and more in my every day paradigm breaking that there seems to be a syndrome of people who try to tie in every legitimate concern with illegitimacy to discredit the processes of life and life’s information.

I call this the “Boy who cried wolf” syndrome. Lets examine the classic children’s fable:

From Wikipedia:

“The Boy Who Cried Wolf, also known as The Shepherd Boy and the Wolf, is a fable attributed to Aesop (210 in Perry’s numbering system[1]). The protagonist of the fable is a bored shepherd boy who entertained himself by calling out “Wolf!”. Nearby villagers who came to his rescue found that the alarms were false and that they had wasted their time. When the boy was actually confronted by a wolf, the villagers did not believe his cries for help and the wolf ate the flock (and in some versions the boy). The moral is stated at the end of the fable as:

Even when liars tell the truth, they are never believed. The liar will lie once, twice, and then perish when he tells the truth.”

They boy cried “Wolf” over and over again, with illegitimate reasons. The townspeople got tired of being alerted for no reason, and let him get eaten alive.

The 10th Amendment
Regardless what you think of the Civil War and its reasoning, what we’re expected by the mainstream to take away from Civil War Studies is that the Southern States were trying to use the 10th Amendment to justify what they felt was a legitimate practice, in violating the rest of the Bill of Rights of certain individuals. The 13th and the 14th Amendment was written.

Ever since then, 10th Amendment discussion has been based mostly on Abortion Law.

There is now a movement to re-assert 10th Amendment rights of the States. We are not being taken seriously.

“10th Amendment!! 10th Amendment!!”
“aww you’re just using that to take other humans’ rights”..slaps the boy..goes back to sleep
“10th Amendment!! 10th Amendment!!”
“Abortion? Really”…goes back to bed
2009-
“10th Amendment!! 10th Amendment!!”
“Not again!@ Who Cares? Go to Bed!!”
………..as the states are eaten by wolves.

Impeachment
“Impeach!! Bad President!!”
“He’s lying about a blow job. This is what is so important, that you called all of us here?”…goes back to bed
“Impeach!! Bad President!!”
“NO MORE PARTISAN GAMES!! GO TO BED!!”
……the wolves eat the constitution

Who do we blame?
Those who make our processes and information illegitimate?
I say we blame the townspeople.
When it’s your duty to watch a child, no matter how many times he gets out of hand and cries wolf, he is still your responsibility.

Reject the notion that any information or constitutional process is no good based on past experience.

Keep an open mind and an open eye trained on your Government.
Or we are ALL Dinner to the wolves.

-Kevin L. Kobe

Is MDC Conserving?

Monday, May 4th, 2009
Dear friends in liberty,
•  On 4-28-2009 my employment with the Missouri Department of Conservation was terminated.
•  The reason given was “work place violence.”
•  I disagree with this reason.
•  On 4-26-09 I yelled at a volunteer who was taunting and teasing me.  This person was making fun of my name, calling me, “Rene-Ahh.”  I raised my voice.  I did NOT threaten, swear at, or call her names.  I simply told her that I was sick of her taunting me and using tax-payer money to promote big business and lobbying groups.
The full details of my separation are lengthy and warrant further investigation by the Missouri Department of Conservation, the State Treasurer, as well as the tax payers of Missouri.  I will provide you with the highlights that led up to my termination.
•  My supervisor at the Shepherd of the Hills Visitor Center, John Miller, recruited me as a volunteer after I was hired to fill a position of Public Service Clerk.
•  John’s wife, Kathy, is in charge of running special events at the visitor center.
•  At some special events John and Kathy sometimes appear to quarrel.  I have been put in the middle by Kathy requesting that I walk across the property and retrieve John, and John sending me back to Kathy with a message.  I was in no position to say no to the boss or the boss’s wife.  I was working and getting paid by the state at these events.
•  In the early part of February, John placed Kathy and another volunteer, Carrie-Ann in charge of coordinating an Earth Day event for 4-25-09.  Kathy requested that I organize a local food workshop.  I agreed to volunteer for this task, and spent my days off driving to or calling people in my area, asking them to set-up a booth at the event.  I told people this was a celebration of all things local and a demonstration of how small businesses are better for the environment.
•  In the early part of March, Kathy and Carrie-Ann announced that they were inviting Lowe’s and Home Depot to the event.  I told John, Kathy, and Carrie-Ann that the people I had invited would feel insulted by this.  I resigned as a volunteer for the state and turned over all contacts I had made to Kathy and Carrie-Ann.  I was content to continue my job as a public service clerk.  I just did not want to volunteer anymore.
•  In early April the small, local businesses I had contacted in February began calling me.  They wanted to know why I had made no further contact.  I tried to talk to John about this.  John cut me off and told me to talk to Kathy.
•  I did talk to Kathy, who lectured me about my communication skills and frequent misunderstandings.  I was very hurt and angry about this lecture, but could not go to my boss because it was his wife giving the lecture.
•  In late April, I opened a package that arrived at the visitor’s center.  This package was from the Missouri Corn Growers Association, a lobbying group that seeks government funding.  The package was full of brochures promoting the use and more funding for ethanol.  I asked John what this was for and he said they were to be given out at the Earth Day event.
•  On 4-28-09 Carrie-Ann came to the visitor’s center to work on Earth Day projects.  Every time I saw her she made fun of my name.  She knows how to pronounce my name.  I have heard her say it correctly.  I asked her why she was using tax payer time and facilities to promote a lobbying group.  She said she used to work for Monsanto.  I yelled at her.  I yelled that my name is Renea and I disapprove of a former Monsanto employee using tax dollars to promote a practice that seeks government funding to burn food and drive up the price of groceries.  I yelled that I can barely afford to feed my family as it is.  Then I left.
•  I also spent a week working with an employee, Bryon, who came to work late and left early everyday.  Furthermore, when Bryon is at work he spends his day in my boss’s office surfing the internet and sending email.  Bryon makes more than $15 an hour.
•  I had complained to John about this several times.  When I resigned as a volunteer John became more critical of my work.  I feed the turtles too much (I used my own money to buy food for the turtles).  I was late one morning and John told me to “not make a habit of it.”  In the two plus years that I have worked for him I had been late maybe five times.
•  I did Bryon’s job and my job on the days I worked with Bryon.  Other employees voiced the same complaints to John.
I never received any warning or criticism about my work until I resigned as a volunteer.  Everyday I strived to do better than the last.  I did every task assigned to me, as well as compensated for Bryon’s absence.  I spent two years volunteering so I could learn more about the job I was getting paid to do.
•  John is a member of the National Association of Interpreter’s.  John and Kathy used tax payer money to fly around the United States to hand out awards.  I helped John with his credit card statements every month.  The State of Missouri has paid thousands of dollars for plane tickets alone.  John took his wife, Kathy, and the state paid for private hotel rooms and food.  John and Kathy have taken at least three trips in the past year.  Each trip was 5 – 10 days long.  The people of Missouri has footed the bill.
Any ideas on how to stop the Missouri Department of Conservation from abusing our money and neglecting our citizens and wildlife?
Your friend in Liberty,
Renea McMasters

My Speech From LRP’s Grassroots Training 4-26-09

Friday, May 1st, 2009

Below is the speech I wrote for LRP’s grassroots training that took place last Sunday. I got some good reviews, so I thought I’d post it.

Readers, please keep in mind a few things:

-I did not present this verbatim, and never intended to. I ad-libbed parts of my speech, if anything this was to serve as a guide.

-This was to be presented to a liberty-minded group of political activists, so I wrote it that way. At some point, I’d like to revisit and expand upon this subject matter in a more general way, but for that day’s purposes, I stuck to how my subject matter related to advancing the cause of liberty.

-The subject matter at hand is infinitely complicated, and I’m almost ashamed that I tried to express it in speech format, much less in under half an hour. Again, I plan on expanding on what I’ve said here. If anything, my speech was meant to spark interest in what I was talking about.

-I used the word “Love” entirely too often, in my opinion. The word is overused these days, and mostly refers to things other than what I consider “love”. For the purposes of this speech, when I say “love” I’m referring to either the absence of fear, or “stewardship”(as Darryl Drumright described it to me after my speech), or both.

I hope you enjoy reading this speech as much as I enjoyed giving it. Thanks to the Liberty Restoration Project for putting on last weekends wonderful events, and to Catherine especially for housing my poor ass all weekend.

Critiques are not only welcome, but encouraged!

-Josh Carter

“You won’t hear me talking about a lot of issues today. You won’t hear me telling you what bills to support or oppose or how to go door to door. I will not be performing a skit today. What I will be talking about, what I will attempt to describe, is the fire inside me that makes me go, that demands that I take action, that burns through walls of fear and lights the way in the dark places.

Such things are hard to describe, so bear with me. Like I said, I won’t be talking much politics, instead I want to talk about the ways I’ve made some progress in advancing the cause of liberty, and to describe that, first I must describe some of the obstacles to the success of liberty and peace.

So, it seems we’ve got a struggle of mindsets on our hands…. On one extreme we have those that wish to be absolutely free; those that wish to self-govern; those that believe that where true liberty exists, peace and prosperity will follow closely by.

On the other hand, we have those of us who think that central planning and control is the cure for our societal woes; those that see the average human as unfit to make one’s own decisions; those that believe coercion can bring peace, and we’ve got everything in between.

Now, the thing is, from what I see, there are people on both sides that think one way and feel the other. What I mean by that is I’ve seen plenty of people who would identify themselves as liberal or maybe even socialist, but when I look at them I see someone that holds some very libertarian beliefs, but they will deny it to the bitter end. By the same token, I’ve met people that call themselves “libertarian” or “liberty-minded” that strike me as rather fascist.

Now, this is a strange obstacle. It causes plenty of unnecessary misunderstandings, and the consequences are real, but they are hard to spot, and harder to define, and the solutions are difficult to even fathom. I could go on for hours about the ins and outs of it all, but today I want to focus on the idea of someone supporting the nuts and bolts of why liberty and freedom work, but without truly holding them in your heart.

This has several manifestations. Maybe we try to administer our concept of “freedom”, attempting to force it on others in a grand display of hypocrisy. This always gets us nowhere, how could one force someone to be free? One cannot, but the idea that you can comes from the fear of others being free. The same people that want their own personal freedom can sometimes judge others as unworthy of the same liberty.

Others want to be free, but they are afraid of it. Consciously or not, freedom scares them. They live life codependent on the people around them, not truly living an individual life.

The list goes on, but the common theme is fear. This fear, like any fear, is a prison, and an obstacle to happiness.

One subject that I want to get into is apathy and defeatism. To stand up for one’s self is taboo, to speak out is looked at as dangerous, and it’s no surprise. Our leaders don’t seem to like dissent. A friend of mine from Phelps County told me once, “Josh, there may be old rebels, and there may be bold rebels, but there are no old, bold rebels.” And she’s right.

Of course, some are jailed or killed, but I think a good many simply burn themselves out. They are swallowed up by a sense that they won’t get anywhere, that their fight is hopeless—that harassment and ridicule will be the only rewards for their efforts. All their love and ability is shrouded by this fear, this hopelessness.

Eventually, we get to the point where we say to ourselves: what’s so bad about apathy? Who can help it in times like these? We say to ourselves: Who will help me, who will carry this burden for me? Without this help, surely there is little chance that I can make a difference. Without someone to guide me, how could I possibly find my way? I’m just one drop in a sea of humanity, what could I possibly effect?

We find it easier, then, to just blend in with the crowd, and try to make the best out of our caged existence. As long as I get my paycheck and my sitcoms and my McDonald’s, who really cares what else goes on, right? It is neither my fault nor my problem if my government does things that I don’t approve of, because once you give up control of your own way, you have no responsibility for what happens, kinda comforting, right?

We’re surrounded by the notion that there is no need to express real individuality, the processed, quality-controlled, candy-coated stuff, is much easier swallow, thank you very much. Real individuality is only for those who have earned it, like movie stars, rock stars, rappers, sports “heroes”, and all our favorite reality TV characters. For us, we get to imitate their greatness and try to see ourselves in them, and endlessly hope to one day be like them.

Well, if this is your way of thinking, I’ve got some bad news for you. Furthermore, if you are looking for a better way of living, I’ve got some really GOOD news for you. But first the bad news.

The Bad News is that probably none of us will ever win a Nobel Prize or be on MTV Cribs or hit a home run in a major league ballgame. The Bad News is that to identify with and try to be someone else, is to lose your way. There’s a reason they call it your life, you know. It’s because when you let someone else dictate how you “should” be, you turn your back on the idea that you were born perfect, to be perfectly the human being you were made to be.

See, the dirty little secret that those who would control you don’t want you to know is that you are responsible for the world around you whether you outwardly participate in it or not. Many wish to avoid “rocking the boat”. But I assure you, inaction and submission have some quite serious and real impacts on the world around you, and the consequences you hope to avoid by playing along are nothing compared to repercussions of sloth.

I’m sure I don’t have to explain to anyone here the dangers of incremental encroachments on liberty, but they illustrate my point beautifully, and it’s been said before, so here I paraphrase Benjamin Franklin: When we are willing to give up, yes, a little, tiny bit of our personal liberty, so that we can feel secure in our social setting, we will lose both the liberty to be ourselves and the feeling of security in being ourselves, and rightfully so!

I’m not going to stand here today and pretend like this is an easy concept to adopt, however. We just be ourselves, and everything works out, and there’s no pain or discomfort, right? Yeah, not so much. There certainly are some complications to this idea.

The desire to “fit in” cannot be ignored, first off. It is a strong compulsion, and is hammered into our beings from a young age from all angles, but I do not find it to be inherent. If it were, youthful angst would be a very different beast. Certainly, children look to their parent’s for approval, but the healthy child takes it no further than a friendship level, but more on that later.

The fact of the matter is that many of us feel this so-called “need” to belong to something. We require other’s approval for our own happiness, we let ourselves be tugged around by strings others give us and the more we fear the person on the other end, the more tightly we hold the string.

Of course, nobody wants to call it fear. Most call it passion, hate, even love or simply “business”. Justify it however you like, the fact remains that it is fear, plain and simple. Fear of what others think. How silly is that? Being afraid of an opinion. Bah.

But for many of us it’s not just the fear of ridicule or being ostracized, it’s the rush they get from others’ approval. This can be even more dangerous, as this emotion is rooted in the same fear, but it masquerades itself as pride, and passes in most circles as self-esteem. But every time we seek that rush, we ensure a later depression, when reality changes around us and we are still clinging wantonly to our social addictions.

And last but not least of the complications I want to mention is complacency. We say “well, it’s not that bad,” and frequently, it’s not. Most times standing up for what’s right doesn’t seem worth the trouble if you only look at the short term consequences. And in this, complacency can be one of the most dangerous traps to fall into, because it is the foundation that incrementalism is built upon.

Think about it: if there was a severe enough backlash every time the government stepped outside its moral bounds in the most minute and seemingly harmless way, could we have ever gotten to where we are today? But how do we first accomplish that, then subsequently maintain such vigilance? What virtue is it that can keep the spirit of liberty alive in the hearts of We the People? Is there such a thing?

Well, my friends, I am here today to tell you that there is such a light at the end of this tunnel, and I call it awareness. Think about that word for a second: AWARENESS. What does that mean to you? To me, the key to success in life—no matter what your goals are—is absolute awareness of everything going on both inside and around you. Your fears, desires, ambitions, the repulsions and attractions you feel for others, and the effects they have on you and your actions.

And I’m not talking about being informed or educated. Don’t get me wrong, book smarts and keeping up with current events are both important, but at best, they make up 25% of what is needed for functional humanity. The rest is awareness.

To be truly free, one must be aware. Without awareness of our emotions, the actions they lead to, and the consequences of those actions, we are flailing away in the dark, condemning ourselves to a life of hit-and-miss, we will never be acting, always reacting, and always playing catch-up to our marionettes, begging them for a freedom we didn’t know we possessed all along.

And how do we achieve such awareness? It’s actually very simple: we watch, we comprehend, but we do not judge. We detach from our egos, and simply observe. We make no effort to change, we just sit and watch. That’s all you have to do!

Like I said, it is very simple, but no one is saying that this will be easy or painless. The ease with which this change happens is inversely proportionate to the amount of unnecessary attachments we hold on to, and the pain is likewise directly proportionate.

One my favorite illustrations of this is the story of a painter named Joe. One day, Joe was painting on a ladder, when the footing of the ladder slipped out from under him, and he fell over 20 feet to the ground. His friends rushed to his side. “Joe, are you OK? That was quite a fall, did it hurt?”

Joe responded quite accurately, “No, the fall was fine, it was the stop that hurt.”

You see, in this reality, as human beings, we have the freedom of choice. There is no law of physics that will stop us from choosing our own path, right or wrong. We may free fall as long as we like, but the second our fallacies collide with reality—BOOM—pain manifests. A very wise man once said that “human suffering occurs when our illusions collide with reality.”

So the lesson here is when you feel a negative emotion coming over you, stop and identify just what illusion of yours is colliding with reality. Like I said, DON’T JUDGE! Don’t become frustrated or punish yourself, that only creates more illusions and misconceptions. Just watch, identify, listen, discern.

Be like the Rose. One of my favorite authors, Anthony DeMello said it something like this: we all have our flowers, our so-called “good qualities”, and we also all bear thorns. We spend much time vainly trying to enhance our natural beauty, and at the same time we are ashamed of our thorns. But not the rose! The rose makes no attempt to brighten its colors when being admired, nor increase its fragrance when an admirer stoops to enjoy it. At the same time, the rose makes no attempt to drop its thorns when an admirer pricks himself on one—the rose knows they are there for a reason, as well. No, the rose simply is what it was made to be, and it fulfills its role perfectly, without any ambition to be more, nor any fear of being less.

With this awareness of your own perfection, your fears will have no pull on you, and your love will become true love, for you will truly love yourself. The things you do will cease to be reactions, but instead actions. Without fear, the most disastrous circumstances are simply a new beginning. You simply pick up and go on, not wasting time on negative emotions, but not ignoring them, either.

Of course we will feel bad when we do not succeed, or if plans we spent weeks on are ruined, but we will be happy nonetheless, because we are not afraid. We carry on.

What does this have to do with politics? Well, if you like public control over private matters and disdain the idea of personal liberty, not a damn thing. But there is no way to truly further the cause of freedom without being free yourself. There is no way to spread love with fear. The best way to spread liberty is to live it.

The person that can love himself, to me, is what Thomas Paine described as a “Hero in the most sober sense of the word.” Not the hero who will jump on a grenade to save his squad or in front of a bullet to save a loved one. But the hero who just won’t, just can’t stop in the face of injustice and violation of basic human rights.

Whether their style is extroverted or introverted, they don’t quit. They may not be writing their Senator or planning an event all the time, but in everyday life, they are living the good life, spreading peace simply by their presence, not because it makes them feel good, but because its what they felt like doing at the time. They’re simply happy, for no other reason than there is no reason not to be.

There’s always a reason to get upset, but once you realize you get a choice in the matter, you don’t get all that upset anymore. There’s always a heckler, but that doesn’t mean you have to be mad at them. One of the most important things you can do in your life is to get rid of the idea that other people can anger you.

They can certainly try, but it’s up to you whether or not to get mad. When we say, “I am sooo mad at so and so,” we say it all. “I AM MAD”. The verb is yours, you are doing the action. The trick is, you can say “so and so made me mad”, but that’s in the past tense. When you are angry, it’s you doing it.

So just drop it. See the negative emotion, identify it, realize that you don’t have to identify with it, and let it go.

So if you’re not negatively effected by other’s dissent or fear, then you are free to feel your own feelings, and, just as important, think your own thoughts. You won’t rely on other’s opinions for your own. You will still need to listen, to take advice, but the final decision is always yours, and always best fits your own needs.

I’ve never read any Ayn Rand, but plenty of people have told me I need to, and I certainly selfishness as a virtue. Not greed, that is fear. But self-centered is all we can be. The evils of keeping to one’s self can never overcome the misdeeds done in the name of helping someone else. Charity is wonderful, if done voluntarily. But charity ends and suppression begins when there is a perpetual support system in place.

These concepts are taken for granted in the libertarian community in reference to economics, but how many realize they reach into the social realm as well? Just as free markets require individuality and can be smothered by interdependency, so can the personality wither and become atrophic when we rely on others for our own self-esteem.

The sometimes frightening but truly joyous truth is that we are alone. Not to say we are lonely, but instead emotionally and intellectually self-sufficient, with everything we need to be happy already inside us and everything we need to know around us.

One of the most beautiful things I took away from the series “Band of Brothers” was the name of their training camp. It was named after a nearby mountain that stood alone. The name of the mountain was “Currahee”, a Native American word that meant, “We stand alone, together.”

So, we stand alone as individuals, but together in the face of tyranny. I can’t tell you how honored I’ve been to stand among some of the heroes in this movement and in this room today, but I can tell you I’ve seen what just one of us can do.

As individuals, we can be downright frightening to the establishment. Together, we will be the end of it. Thank you, and God bless you, my heroes.”

Chuck Baldwin Responds to Missouri Militia Memo

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

MISSOURI STATE POLICE THINK YOU AND I ARE TERRORISTS

 

By Chuck Baldwin
March 17, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

“I realize that there are people who will dismiss this kind of story as insignificant. They shouldn’t. This is very serious and should be treated as such. Anyone who knows anything at all about history knows that before a state or national government can persecute–and commit acts of violence against–a group of people, they must first marginalize the group from society’s mainstream and categorize it as dangerous.

Rome did exactly that to Christians, as did Mao’s China; Hitler’s Germany did the same thing to Jews; Stalin’s Russia did the same thing to political dissenters, etc. That a State police agency in America would actually infer that people who supported Ron Paul, Bob Barr, or myself in a political campaign are somehow indistinguishable from violence-prone “militias” is beyond insulting: it is a smear campaign, and might should even be regarded as a hate crime!”

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin498.htm

 

Tune into to hear Chuck Baldwin interviewed on KCXL 1140 am radio (in Kansas City, Missouri) on Thursday at noon.  Catherine will co-host Jason Little John’s show.